Skip to main content

Emergency application · Capital case

Federal review of state convictions

Kayle Barrington Bates v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Denied
No. 25A174Stay applicationFiled by a prisoner facing executionPresented to Justice ThomasFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on August 19, 2025 and refused to halt the execution.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 11 days after filing

What's being asked

Death-row prisoner Kayle Barrington Bates asked the Court to pause his scheduled execution while it considers his request for Supreme Court review. Bates says the Eleventh Circuit used too high a bar to let him appeal his constitutional claims. He also challenges federal law's requirement that courts defer to state-court rulings.

What the Court did

The Court refused emergency help, denying a stay (a temporary pause) of Bates's execution and denying his request for Supreme Court review. The Court did not publish how the justices voted. The order does not explain its reasons or decide whether Bates's underlying legal claims are right.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 91 rulings on capital applications decided without a response came 2 to 5 days after filing, and the median was 3 days; this one was ruled on 11 days after filing.

What it means

This emergency ruling addresses only Bates's request for a temporary pause; it does not decide whether his underlying claims are correct. The Eleventh Circuit's refusal to let him appeal remains in place. The docket lists no related case on the main question, and the Court did not set this application for argument.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A174. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 4, 2026