Skip to main content

Emergency application

Pausing an appeals court ruling

Michael Miller v. Lancaster County, Pennsylvania

Denied
No. 25A1457Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice AlitoFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on July 1, 2026: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 14 days after filing

What's being asked

Michael Miller asks the Supreme Court to temporarily pause a Third Circuit ruling involving Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. The record does not explain what the dispute is about or what the appeals court ordered.

What the Court did

Justice Alito refused Miller’s request for emergency help and denied the application (turned it down). The order does not decide who wins the underlying dispute, and the docket does not say how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 252 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 30 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 14 days after filing.

What it means

The Third Circuit ruling is not paused and remains in effect. The record lists no related Supreme Court case about the main dispute and no argument date.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A1457. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 4, 2026