Skip to main content

Emergency application

Pausing a court ruling

John Xavier George Anaya v. Superior Court of California, Napa County

Denied
No. 25A1447Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice KaganFrom Supreme Court of California

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on June 27, 2026: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 49 days after filing

What's being asked

John Xavier George Anaya asks the U.S. Supreme Court to temporarily pause a ruling by the Supreme Court of California. The record does not explain what the ruling addressed or what the underlying dispute concerns.

What the Court did

The Supreme Court refused Anaya’s request for an emergency pause (denied the application); Justice Kagan issued the denial. The order does not decide who should win the underlying dispute. The Court did not publish how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 252 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 30 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 49 days after filing.

What it means

The California Supreme Court’s ruling was not paused, but this emergency decision does not decide who wins the underlying dispute. The docket lists no related case asking the Supreme Court to decide the main question, and no argument was set.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A1447. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 4, 2026