Skip to main content

Emergency application · Capital case

Lethal injection procedures

Andrew Richard Lukehart v. Florida

Denied
No. 25A1332Stay applicationFiled by a prisoner facing executionPresented to Justice ThomasFrom Supreme Court of Florida

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on June 1, 2026 and refused to halt the execution.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 3 days after filing

What's being asked

Andrew Richard Lukehart, a Florida prisoner under a death sentence, asked the Court to pause his scheduled June 2 execution. He also asked the Court to review a Florida Supreme Court ruling that denied his post-warrant claims. He says those claims raise constitutional questions about Florida's lethal-injection procedures, cruel punishment, and due process.

What the Court did

The Court refused to pause Lukehart’s execution and denied his stay request (request for a temporary pause). It also refused to hear his case, denying his petition for certiorari (request for Supreme Court review). The Court did not publish how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 82 rulings on capital applications decided without a response came 2 to 5 days after filing, and the median was 3 days; this one was ruled on 3 days after filing.

What it means

This order does not pause the scheduled execution, but it does not decide the constitutional questions Lukehart raised. The Florida Supreme Court's ruling remains in place; no related case on the main question or argument is listed.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A1332. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 4, 2026