Skip to main content

Emergency application

Speech in judicial elections

Jennifer Jordan v. Victoria Darrisaw

Denied
No. 25A1275Vacatur applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice ThomasFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on May 22, 2026, leaving the lower-court order in place.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 4 days after filing

What's being asked

A private party asks the Supreme Court to undo (vacate) a lower-court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The case is Jennifer Jordan v. Victoria Darrisaw.

What the Court did

The Court denied the request on May 22, 2026, leaving the lower-court order in place.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 70 rulings on applications where the Court asked for a response came 12 to 27 days after filing, and the median was 17 days; this one was ruled on 4 days after filing.

What it means

This is a temporary order about what happens while the case is decided, not a ruling on who is right. The case continues in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A1275. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 4, 2026