Skip to main content

Emergency application · Capital case

Jury role in death sentences

Michael Tanzi v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Denied
No. 24A948Stay applicationFiled by a prisoner facing executionPresented to Justice ThomasFrom Supreme Court of Florida

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on April 8, 2025 and refused to halt the execution.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 4 days after filing

What's being asked

Tanzi, a Florida death-row prisoner, asked the Supreme Court to pause his scheduled execution while it considered whether to hear his case. He argues that his death sentence is unconstitutional because a judge, not a jury, made the factual findings needed to impose it.

What the Court did

The Court refused emergency help: it denied Tanzi’s request for a temporary pause of his execution. It also denied review (refused to hear his case); the Court did not publish how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 89 rulings on capital applications decided without a response came 2 to 5 days after filing, and the median was 3 days; this one was ruled on 4 days after filing.

What it means

The requested pause was temporary; refusing it does not decide Tanzi’s constitutional challenge. The Florida Supreme Court’s denial of state relief remains in place. No related merits case (a case on the main legal questions) is listed, and no argument was set.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 24A948. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 3, 2026