Emergency application · Capital case
Execution by nitrogen gas
Jessie Hoffman v. Gary Westcott, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections
What did the Court do?
The Court denied the request on March 18, 2025 and refused to halt the execution.
Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case. Justice Sotomayor, Justice Kagan, Justice Jackson, and Justice Gorsuch would have ruled the other way.
What's being asked
Death-row prisoner Jessie Hoffman asks the Court to pause his execution (grant a stay) while it considers his petition for Supreme Court review. He argues Louisiana's planned nitrogen-gas execution would interfere with his Buddhist meditative breathing and violate his religious rights.
What the Court did
The Court refused to pause Hoffman's execution, denying his request for a stay (a temporary pause). This order does not decide his underlying challenge to Louisiana's execution method. Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson would have granted the pause; Justice Gorsuch dissented (disagreed with the result).
- Dissented
- Vote not published
- Dissenting · 4recorded against the Court's order
What it means
The Court's emergency ruling addresses only Hoffman's request for a temporary pause; it does not decide who wins his challenge to Louisiana's execution method. The Fifth Circuit's judgment remains in place; no related case or argument date is listed on this docket.
Sources
Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 24A893. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.