Skip to main content

Emergency application

Evidence prosecutors must share

Roman Storm v. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Denied
No. 24A759Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice SotomayorFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on February 13, 2025: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 13 days after filing

What's being asked

Roman Storm asks the Supreme Court to pause a lower-court ruling while he seeks Supreme Court review. He says the district court violated Rule 16 (a court rule) and challenges the standard for ordering it to act. The excerpt does not explain the underlying case or identify the specific order he wants paused.

What the Court did

Justice Sonia Sotomayor refused Storm’s request for a temporary pause (denied the application). The order does not decide who wins the underlying case. The docket does not report how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 300 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 28 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 13 days after filing.

What it means

This ruling concerns temporary emergency help, not the final outcome of Storm’s case. The Second Circuit ruling was not paused. The docket lists no related Supreme Court case on the main legal questions or argument date.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 24A759. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 3, 2026