Skip to main content

Emergency application · Capital case

State rules and federal review

Steven Lawayne Nelson v. Texas

Denied
No. 24A753Stay applicationFiled by a prisoner facing executionPresented to Justice AlitoFrom Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on February 5, 2025 and refused to halt the execution.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 2 days after filing

What's being asked

Steven Lawayne Nelson, a Texas death-row prisoner, asked the Supreme Court to pause his scheduled execution while it considered hearing his case. Nelson says the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals rejected his later state challenge without reviewing its claims. He asks the Supreme Court to review that rejection and let him pursue those claims in state court.

What the Court did

The Court refused to pause Nelson’s execution and denied Supreme Court review (refused to hear the case). It did not publish how the justices voted or explain its reasons, and it did not decide whether Nelson’s claims are valid.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 89 rulings on capital applications decided without a response came 2 to 5 days after filing, and the median was 3 days; this one was ruled on 2 days after filing.

What it means

The emergency ruling addressed immediate relief; it did not decide whether Nelson’s claims are valid. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ rejection remains in place. The record lists no related case for a full decision and no argument date.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 24A753. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 3, 2026