Skip to main content

Emergency application

Leonard Harris v. Nakita Ross

Denied
No. 24A744Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to The Chief JusticeFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on February 7, 2025: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 10 days after filing

What's being asked

Leonard Harris, a private party, asks the Supreme Court to temporarily pause a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The record does not say what the ruling or dispute between Harris, Nakita Ross, and the other named parties concerns.

What the Court did

The Chief Justice refused Harris’s request for a temporary pause (denied the application). The record gives no explanation, and the order does not decide who wins the underlying dispute. The Court did not publish how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 302 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 28 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 10 days after filing.

What it means

This emergency ruling addresses temporary relief; it does not decide who wins the underlying dispute. The Fourth Circuit ruling remains in place. The record lists no related case asking the Supreme Court to decide the main question, and no argument is set.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 24A744. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 3, 2026