Skip to main content

Emergency application

Richard Rynn v. UHS of Phoenix, LLC

Denied
No. 24A1167Emergency applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice KaganFrom Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on November 10, 2025.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 164 days after filing

What's being asked

A private party asks the Supreme Court for emergency relief. The case is Richard Rynn v. UHS of Phoenix, LLC.

What the Court did

Application (24A1167) denied by the Court.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Thomas
  2. Roberts
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Days from filing to a ruling for 71 rulings on applications decided without a response since January 1, 2025. The band is the middle half, the tick the median, and the mark this application: ruled 164 days after filing.

What it means

This is a temporary order about what happens while the case is decided, not a ruling on who is right. The case continues in the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 24A1167. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked September 24, 2026