Skip to main content

Emergency application · Capital case

Brain injuries and death sentences

Jeffrey Glenn Hutchinson v. Florida

Denied
No. 24A1037Stay applicationFiled by a prisoner facing executionPresented to Justice ThomasFrom Supreme Court of Florida

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on May 1, 2025 and refused to halt the execution.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 4 days after filing

What's being asked

Jeffrey Glenn Hutchinson, a Florida prisoner under a death sentence, asked the Court to pause his scheduled May 1, 2025 execution. He sought a stay (temporary pause) until the Court considered his request to review the case. He argues Gulf War injuries caused lasting physical, psychological, and brain-related harm, reducing his moral responsibility and making his death sentence unconstitutional.

What the Court did

The Court refused to pause Hutchinson’s execution (denied his application for a stay, or temporary pause). It also refused to hear his case (denied his petition for certiorari, a request for Supreme Court review). The order did not decide whether his death sentence is constitutional; the Court did not publish how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 89 rulings on capital applications decided without a response came 2 to 5 days after filing, and the median was 3 days; this one was ruled on 4 days after filing.

What it means

The emergency ruling decided only whether to pause the execution, not whether Hutchinson’s challenge succeeds. The docket lists no related case for deciding the main question and no argument date. It does not say what further proceedings, if any, continue in the Supreme Court of Florida.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 24A1037. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 3, 2026