Cases compared
Cade Brumley, Superintendent, Louisiana State Education v. Darcy Roake, Reverend, Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Children, Real Parties in Interest A. V. and S. V. vs. D. Andrew Wilson, Attorney General of Ohio v. Kenneth M. Miller vs. Donald N. S. Mortvedt, Petitioner v. Charles E. Clawson, III, et al.
No. 25-1360No. 25-1366No. 25-6484
Side by side
| Fact | Cade Brumley, Superintendent, Louisiana State Education v. Darcy Roake, Reverend, Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Children, Real Parties in Interest A. V. and S. V. | D. Andrew Wilson, Attorney General of Ohio v. Kenneth M. Miller | Donald N. S. Mortvedt, Petitioner v. Charles E. Clawson, III, et al. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Docket | 25-1360 | 25-1366 | 25-6484 |
| Status | Before Arguments | Before Arguments | Before Arguments |
| Date | October Term 2025 (2025–2026) | October Term 2025 (2025–2026) | October Term 2025 (2025–2026) |
| Question presented | 1. Whether respondents’ challenge to H.B. 71 is non-justiciable. 2. Whether H.B. 71 is facially unconstitutional under either the Establishment Clause or the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. | Under §2 of the Twenty-first Amendment, may a State restrict out-of-state retailers from directly shipping alcohol to in-state consumers and may it cap the amount of alcohol that individuals may personally transport into the State? | 1. Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment excludes equity from jurisdiction over deprivations of liberty, including parental liberty? 2. Whether a district court’s sua sponte dismissal of a pro se, fee-paid § 1983 action, without notice or leave to amend to add proper state officials under Ex parte Young or to present the federal constitutional questions, violates due process, burdens the First Amendment right to petition, and impairs this Court’s appellate jurisdiction? |
| Summary | Louisiana education officials ask the Supreme Court to review a challenge to H.B. 71, a state law that has been challenged under the First Amendment’s religion clauses. The case concerns whether the challengers may bring the case in federal court and whether the law is unconstitutional on its face under the Establishment Clause or Free Exercise Clause. | Ohio asks the Supreme Court to uphold parts of its three-tier alcohol system that bar out-of-state retailers from shipping wine directly to Ohio consumers and limit how much alcohol residents may personally bring into the state. The case concerns whether those rules are permitted by the Twenty-first Amendment despite constitutional limits on state laws that burden interstate commerce. | Donald N. S. Mortvedt has asked the Supreme Court to review a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. His petition appears to raise a Fourteenth Amendment due process argument concerning equity, but the Court has not yet agreed to decide any question. |
Relationship
- Shared issue
- First Amendment
- Why compared
- Reviewed First Amendment tags connect these current-term public cases.
Related
Sources
- Built from reviewed issue tags and official docket records. Status lines and questions presented come from the tracked case data.