Skip to main content

Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins.

Updated Jun 10, 1996

In brief

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · June 3, 1996 · Opinion by Justice O'Connor

What it’s about
The Court addressed whether a federal court can abstain from hearing a case involving damages, specifically in the context of an insurance insolvency dispute where state law issues were pending.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins. Co.
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

Question presented

1. Is an abstention-based remand order appealable as a final order? 2. Can the abstention doctrine recognized in Burford v. Sun Oil Co. be applied in a suit for damages?

Documents

1

Sources

Primary materials from the Court and the parties. Plain-English explainer. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Mar 31, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings