Skip to main content

No. 95-1918October Term 1996Decided March 31, 1997Updated Sep 3, 2026

Arkansas v. Farm Credit Services of Central Arkansas

Production Credit Associations cannot independently use federal court to block state taxes under this exception.

Case status

DecidedDecision released March 31, 1997

Where it stands

Decided 9-0 · March 31, 1997 · Opinion by Justice Kennedy

  • MajorityRehnquistStevensO'ConnorScaliaKennedySouterThomasGinsburgBreyer
Question presented

Do Production Credit Associations fall within the exception in the Tax Injunction Act created by Department of Employment v. United States when they sue by themselves?

Timeline

Decision

What the Court decided

Production Credit Associations cannot independently use federal court to block state taxes under this exception.

Impact

Production Credit Associations seeking to challenge a state tax cannot bypass state tax procedures by filing alone in federal court. For example, an association disputing an Arkansas tax would need the United States as a co-plaintiff.

Opinion documents

Briefing

What it's about

The Court decided that Production Credit Associations cannot sue on their own in federal court to stop state taxes. The United States must join the case for the federal-instrumentality exception to apply.

Vote

Justice Kennedy wrote the 9–0 opinion, joined by Justices Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, and Breyer.

The Court ruled 9-0, with Justice Kennedy writing the majority opinion. Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, and Breyer joined.

Majority

  • Rehnquist
  • Stevens
  • O'Connor
  • Scalia
  • Kennedy
  • Souter
  • Thomas
  • Ginsburg
  • Breyer

Production Credit Associations are not included within the judicial exception to the Act by virtue of their status alone.

Justice Kennedy(majority)

Impact

Production Credit Associations seeking to challenge a state tax cannot bypass state tax procedures by filing alone in federal court. For example, an association disputing an Arkansas tax would need the United States as a co-plaintiff.

What's next

The Court has finished this case. Production Credit Associations challenging state taxes must proceed through the appropriate state process unless the United States joins them in federal court.

What did the Supreme Court rule in Arkansas v. Farm Credit Services?

The Court ruled that Production Credit Associations cannot sue alone in federal court to block state taxes under the federal-instrumentality exception.

Who is affected by Arkansas v. Farm Credit Services?

Production Credit Associations are affected when they challenge state taxes. They need the United States as a co-plaintiff to use this federal-court exception.

What happens next after Arkansas v. Farm Credit Services?

The case is finished. Future tax challenges by these associations must use state procedures unless the United States joins a federal lawsuit.

Timing

Decided March 31, 1997

The Court released its decision on March 31, 1997 without hearing oral argument.

Argument and decision days

Activity

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 3, 2026 · Generated

  • Opinion added: Farm Credit

    Jun 2, 1997 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 3, 2026Methodology

Primary materials

Context reporting