Deadlines for challenging convictions

1. WHETHER STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS MAY APPLY PROCEDURAL BARS, INCLUDING LIMITATIONS PROVISION OF OKLAHOMA STATUTES TITLE 22, SECTION 1080.1, AND THE PROCEDURAL DEFAULT DOCTRINES APPLIED UNDER 28 U.S.C., SECTION 2254, TO DENY REVIEW OF CLAIMS ASSERTING THAT THE UNDERLYING CRIMINAL JUDGMENT IS VOID FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION? 2. WHETHER A STATE COURT JUDGMENT ENTERED WITHOUT JURISDICTION MAY BE ENFORCED IN VIOLATION OF THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, THE MAJOR CRIMES ACT, AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEES OF DUE PROCESS? 3. WHETHER THE TENTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN DENYING FEDERAL HABEAS REVIEW UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2254 BY RELYING UPON STATE PROCEDURAL BARS AND CIRCUIT COURT PRECEDENT, WHERE PETITIONER ALLEGED THAT THE STATE COURT LACKED JURISDICTION AB INITIO? 4. WHETHER THE APPLICATION OF PROCEDURAL BARS TO JURISDICTIONAL CLAIMS CONFLICTS WITH LONGSTANDING PRECEDENT RECOGNIZING THAT A VOID JUDGMENT MAY BE CHALLENGED AT ANY TIME? 5. WHETHER THE FILING LIMITATIONS OF 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A) VIOLATES DUE PROCESS WHEN APPLIED TO JURISDICTIONAL CHALLENGES RENDERED VOID AB INITIO? 6. WHETHER A VOID JUDGMENT RENDERED IN COMPLETE ABSENCE OF JURISDICTION CAN BECOME FINAL FOR THE PURPOSES OF STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS?