Skip to main content

Lawyer help with guilty pleas

Larson v. Caley

Updated Nov 11, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
Kevin A. Larson asks the Supreme Court to review whether his plea counsel’s assistance was deficient in his case from the Tenth Circuit.
What's at stake
Larson’s request for Supreme Court review remains unresolved, and the Court has not yet considered his claim about his plea lawyer.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

His petition was distributed for a conference, but the Court has not agreed to hear it.

The petition concerns a case from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Question presented

Whether assistance of plea counsel was deficient.

What happens next

The Court must decide whether to hear the petition. It was distributed for a Dec. 4, 2026 conference, but that does not guarantee an order date.

Documents

1

Docket activity

5
  • New analysis added

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 11, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Aug 26, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 11, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis