Court power over defendants

1. Whether a district court dismiss a complaint with prejudice pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) , after concluding that service of process was insufficient and the court therefore never acquired personal juridiction over the defendant! notwithstanding this Court's repeated holdings that a judgment entered without personal jurisdiction is void and subject to relief under Rule 60(b)(4)to address those , as well as the Third Circuit's own Precedent and every circuit court of appeals to consider the matter have held that a judgment entered without personal juridiction is void and subject to Rul;e 60(b)(4) relief. 2. Whether a court of appeals exeeds the limits imposd by the "party presentation principle" and the Due Process Clause by affirming the denial of Rule 60(b)(4) relief on legal theories raised sua sponte , after first concluding that Petitioner's Rule 60(b)(4) argument was meritless , without notice , or an opportunity to adddress those newly raised theories. 3. Whether appellate review of a Rule 60(b)(4) motion is confined to determining whether the challenged judgment is void for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant , or whether a court of appeals may instead affirm by conducting an independent merits review unrelated to the jurisdictional issue presented.