Skip to main content

Excessive property tax fines

The Retail Property Trust v. Nassau County Department of Assessment

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
The Retail Property Trust says Nassau County imposed a $4.8 million fine without prior notice or a chance to challenge it. The Second Circuit upheld the fine, and the Trust has petitioned the Supreme Court to review that decision.
What's at stake
The Trust's challenge to the fine and its claim that it lacked a fair chance to contest it remain unresolved at the Supreme Court.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

The Trust alleges Nassau County turned a rarely enforced $500 fine into a $4.8 million penalty without giving it advance notice or a chance to object.

The Trust argues that the appeals court used the wrong approach to judge whether the fine was excessive and whether a state remedy blocks a federal claim over fair procedures.

Question presented

1. Whether, when determining if a civil fine violates the Excessive Fines Clause under United States v. Bajakajian, a court may evaluate the gravity of the underlying offense purely in the abstract (as the Second Circuit did below), or must instead consider the gravity of the specific defendant’s conduct (as six other Circuit Courts have held)? 2. Whether the availability of a state remedy entirely forecloses a procedural due process claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (as the Second Circuit held below), or whether, consistent with this Court’s decisions in Zinermon v. Burch and Knick v. Township of Scott, a plaintiff challenging an official government action may bring a procedural due process claim irrespective of available state remedies (as four other Circuit Courts have held)?

What happens next

The next step is for the Court to decide whether to hear the case. Oral argument is not scheduled; there is no argument or decision window before the Court agrees to review it.

Documents

1

Docket activity

5
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Oct 30, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis