Appeals without full transcripts

1. Whether the Fourteenth Amendment permits a State that provides appellate review to make review of a civil evidentiary appeal effectively unavailable by applying a partial-reporter’s-record rule so strictly that, after an appellant who could not afford the entire transcript obtained substantial portions of the record, the parties briefed the appeal, and no concrete prejudice from the missing statement of issues was identified, the appellate court was required to presume that evidence it did not review supported the judgment. 2. Whether a court of appeals may dismiss an appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6(c) without reaching the merits when the Appellant has identified the issues for review, supplied the testimony forming the evidentiary basis for the judgment, and made a bona fide effort to obtain Appellate review. 3. Whether the Fourteenth Court of Appeals violated Petitioner’s due process rights as guaranteed by the Constitution Fourteen Amendment due process Clause.