Fair access to court evidence

1. Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment permits a state court to terminate substantial civil claims by summary judgment on the basis of expert evidence derived from medical records maintained under seal when the opposing self-represented litigant contends that the sealing and related procedural rulings materially impaired her ability to challenge the authenticity, completeness, and reliability of those same records and to present responsive evidence. 2. Whether procedural due process is satisfied when a court relies on a litigant's failure to produce expert evidence or comply with procedural reguirements to enter summary judgment, where that litigant contends that court-imposed restrictions concerning the underlying evidentiary record materially impaired her ability to obtain and present the evidence necessary to oppose summary judgment. 3. Whether meaningful appellate review and procedural due process are denied when allegedly material motions, objections, or supporting documents are absent from the appellate record, a self-represented litigant's requests to augment that record are denied, and the appellate court thereafter invokes forfeiture or an inadequate record to affirm the termination of her claims without trial.