Limits on court appeals
Deprinzio v. Ludke
In brief
- Where it stands
- Petition Pending
Awaiting an order on the petition
- What it’s about
- Terri Deprinzio has asked the Supreme Court to review whether a state may use an inflexible restriction to block a litigant from seeking further court review under procedures the state established. The petition is pending.
- What's at stake
- Deprinzio's chance to seek further state-court review and pursue her constitutional claims remains unresolved.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
The petition concerns a deadline for requesting more state-court review of claims already raised.
Question presented
1. Whether the Due process Clause of the Fourteenth (14 th ) Amendment permits a State, after establishing procedures for further judicial review of existing claims, to extinguish a litigant ’ s opportunity to invoke those procedures through an inflexible jurisdictional dead-line when the litigant alleges that she did not receive the appellate decision triggering that dead-line, and the state thereafter provides no effective procedure capable of restoring the lost opportunity. 2. Whether a State may Treat federal constitutional claims as procedurally foreclosed where a self represented party expressly presented Due Process and Equal Protection claims during the state appellate proceedings, the appellate court regarded portions of those arguments as inadequately developed, and the litigant was thereafter allegedly deprived by non-receipt of the appellate decision of the opportunity to seek further review before the jurisdictional period expired.
What happens next
The Court must decide whether to hear the case. No oral argument or decision date is set.
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Brief added: Petition
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.