Skip to main content

Notice of sentencing facts

Akporugo v. United States

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
Darlington Akporugo says he was sentenced using factual allegations he had not been told about beforehand; the Fifth Circuit threw out his appeal under the waiver in his plea agreement.
What's at stake
Akporugo’s appeal remains thrown out under the plea-agreement waiver; the Supreme Court has not decided whether to review his case.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

The Supreme Court has distributed his petition for a conference, but has not confirmed that it will hear the case.

The dispute concerns whether a lack of notice about facts used at sentencing can let someone set aside a plea-agreement appeal waiver.

Question presented

Whether the failure to provide adequate notice of the factual basis for a sentence constitutes a miscarriage of justice sufficient to set aside an appeal waiver?

What happens next

The petition was distributed for the Court’s Nov. 13, 2026 conference. That does not mean the Court will agree to hear the case or guarantee an order date.

Documents

1

Docket activity

5
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Sep 28, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis