Skip to main content

Unanimous military trial verdicts

Anderson v. United States

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
Brock T. Anderson and Cody L.
What's at stake
The Fifth Amendment challenge to Anderson's and Kindred's convictions remains unresolved; the Supreme Court has not agreed to review it.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

Kindred, two service members convicted by courts-martial, filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to review whether a panel of nonjudges may convict without a unanimous vote under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.

The petition combines appeals by two service members convicted by courts-martial.

Question presented

Does the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause permit conviction in a court-martial by the non-unanimous vote of a panel of lay members?

What happens next

The Supreme Court must decide whether to hear the petition. No oral argument or decision timing is scheduled before the Court agrees to review it.

Documents

1

Docket activity

5
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Oct 27, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis