Gun rights and danger assessments

1. Whether, as applied here, the First, Second, and Fourteenth Amendments permit a State to employ a totality-of-the-circumstances methodology that transforms concededly lawful conduct into a constitutionally sufficient finding of dangerousness, thereby authorizing the burdening of enumerated constitutional rights without an objectively sufficient present predicate. 2. Whether the First Amendment permits a State to rely upon lawful petitioning activity as a component of a judicial dangerousness determination where the litigation activity was not found to be frivolous, unlawful, or otherwise outside constitutional protection. 3. Whether the Second Amendment, as interpreted in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen and United States v. Rahimi, permits the continued burdening of the right to keep and bear arms where the dangerousness determination rests upon a methodology that aggregates lawful, non-threatening conduct rather than an objectively sufficient present predicate demonstrating a credible threat of physical harm.