Government fraud whistleblower suits

1. Whether Constitional violations occur when federal judiciary fails to recuse as statutorily required, fails to provide de novo review of magistrates sua sponte dismissal of §1983 claims on the basis of judicial immunity denying a suspect class whistleblower relief from constitutional violations confirmed by sanction from the state judicial commission? 2. Circuit split on False Claims Act structural and procedural process, whether: i. sua sponte dismissal during the seal period — prior to notice or intervention from the United States ripens jurisdiction — violates separation-of-powers and denies litigants ’ due process and equal protection; ii. FCA imposes a duty on the government to investigate prior to issuing notice; and iii. FCA claims may be advanced by pro se litigants or should be dismissed to benefit a hypothetical “ better ” litigant that can afford an attorney.