College disability accommodations

1. Whether a plaintiff may be held, as a matter of law, not to be a “qualified individual” under 42 U.S.C. § 12131(2) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act on the basis of academic outcomes obtained under the very accommodations whose adequacy is the disputed question in the case — so that the injury alleged becomes conclusive proof that the plaintiff was never qualified. 2. Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c)(3), which provides that a court “need consider only the cited materials, but it may consider other materials in the record,” permits entry of summary judgment against a nonmovant on a dispositive element without any determination whether the evidence in the summary judgment record would permit a reasonable jury to find in her favor. 3. Whether the elements of a failure-to-accommodate claim brought by a student under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act are supplied by the employment framework of Title I, so that a public university is held to the notice and accommodation obligations of a “covered employer.”?