Skip to main content

Juror lies and fair trials

Larry Jay Bean v. Florida

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
Bean asks the Supreme Court to review his request for a new trial, denied after a juror allegedly hid her and relatives’ involvement in criminal cases; the trial court could not find she lied deliberately.
What's at stake
Bean's request for a new trial and his jury-size claim remain unresolved in the Supreme Court because it has not agreed to hear his petition.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

He also asks whether serious-felony defendants have a constitutional right to 12-person juries and whether his case should await Kian.

Bean alleges that a seated juror concealed that she and relatives had been involved in criminal cases. The trial court could not find that she deliberately lied.

Bean's petition asks how the Supreme Court's rule for false answers to important jury-selection questions applies to alleged concealment.

Question presented

1. Whether the Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury is denied – and a new trial required – when a seated juror gives a false answer during voir dire concealing that she and members of her family were accused, complainants, witnesses, or victims in criminal cases, and whether a defendant’s entitlement to relief turns on proof that the juror’s false answer was deliberate or on the objective effect of the concealment on the defendant’s right to an impartial jury. 2. Whether a defendant charged with a serious felony is deprived of his right, under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, to a trial by a twelve-person jury – the question on which this Court granted certiorari in Kian v. Florida, No. 25-6623 – and whether, because the Petitioner’s conviction remains pending on direct review, this petition should be held pending the decision in Kian and disposed of accordingly.

What happens next

The Court's next step is to decide whether to hear the petition. Oral argument is not scheduled, and no argument or decision window exists before review is granted.

Documents

2

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Oct 21, 2026 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions

    Aug 25, 2026 · Court records

More questions

1
How does Kian relate to Bean's petition?
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear Kian's question about whether serious-felony defendants have a right to 12-person juries; Bean asks the Court to wait for that decision before acting on his petition.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis