Copyright ownership
Alejandro Evaristo Perez v. Disney
In brief
- Where it stands
- Petition Pending
Awaiting an order on the petition
- What it’s about
- Alejandro Evaristo Perez filed a request for Supreme Court review asking the Court either to mediate a proposed $54.081 billion settlement involving apologies and licenses, or to apply Rossi v.
- What's at stake
- Perez’s requests for payment, apologies, licenses, copyright relief and judge retirements remain unresolved; the Supreme Court has not ordered them.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
Motion Picture Association of America and order Disney to pay that amount, let him keep his claimed U.S. copyrights, and retire judges he calls “fallen.”
Perez cites a 2004 Ninth Circuit decision, Rossi v. Motion Picture Association of America, as a basis for the relief he requests.
Question presented
Whether the US Supreme Court wants to mediate a settlement of $54,081.000.000, apologies, and licenses via GRANTED; or whether the Court enforces the case law of ‘ Rossi v. Motion Picture Association of America Inc.. ’ (9th Cir, No. 03'16034, [2004]) bv ordering the Disney Villains to pay the $54.081,000.000, retiring the Fallen Judges, and letting the US Army Veteran 1LT Alejandro Evaristo Perez keep his US copyrights in any US Federal?
What happens next
The next step is for the Court to decide whether to hear the petition. No oral argument or decision date is scheduled.
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Brief added: Petition
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.