Skip to main content

Felon gun ban

Pearson v. United States

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Dismissed

Petition denied.

What it’s about
Clarence Pearson asked the Supreme Court to review whether a federal ban on gun possession by people with certain felony convictions violates the Second Amendment, whether Congress can apply it based on a gun’s earlier trip across state lines, and whether the appeals court must revisit a sentencing decision.
Who it affects
Pearson did not get Supreme Court review, and the Court did not decide the gun-law or sentencing questions he raised.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Clarence Pearson, Petitioner v. United States
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Court refused to hear his case (denied review), so it did not decide those questions.

The case combined challenges to a federal firearm-possession ban and to how the Fifth Circuit reviewed Pearson’s sentence.

Question presented

1. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) comports with the Second Amendment. 2. Whether Congress may criminalize intrastate firearm possession based solely on the firearm crossing state lines at some point before the defendant came to possess it. 3. Whether, under abuse-of-discretion review and absent a finding of harmlessness, a court of appeals must vacate and remand when the sentencing record suggests the district court impermissibly weighed a sentencing factor.

Documents

1

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Brief added: Petition

    Jul 6, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials from the Court and the parties. Grounded in docket records and cited sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings