Skip to main content

Notice before dismissal

Carolynn Elizabeth Wood v. David Lynn Haynes

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
Carolynn Wood argues that Alabama’s highest court violated the Fourteenth Amendment by upholding the decision to throw out her case for a reason neither the defendants raised nor the trial court stated, without giving her notice or a chance to respond; she had asked a court to rule on disputed legal rights.
What's at stake
The Supreme Court has not reviewed Wood's challenge to the dismissal, so her claim remains unresolved there.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

Her petition was sent to a conference for consideration, but that step does not mean the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear it.

Wood argues the Fourteenth Amendment required notice and a chance to respond before Alabama's highest court relied on a new reason to dismiss her case.

Question presented

Whether the Fourteenth Amendment permits a state court of last resort to affirm dismissal with prejudice on a dispositive justiciability ground that the respondents did not raise and the trial court did not state, without notice or a meaningful opportunity to address that ground before judgment, where the petitioner sought a declaration of disputed legal rights and challenged the newly announced ground at the first available opportunity.

What happens next

The petition was sent for consideration at the Court's Dec. 4, 2026 conference. That does not mean the Court agreed to hear it or guarantee an order date; the next step is for the Court to decide whether to take the case.

Documents

1

Docket activity

7
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type

    Nov 4, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

Show 2 more
  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 15, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Brief added: Petition

    Sep 15, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis