Pension benefit calculations
FedEx v. Watt
In brief
- Where it stands
- Petition Pending
Awaiting an order on the petition
- What it’s about
- FedEx Corporation and other pension-plan petitioners ask whether federal law’s requirement that a surviving-spouse pension be equal in value to a single-life pension limits the assumptions used to calculate it.
- What's at stake
- How the pension plans calculate surviving-spouse benefits remains disputed; the Supreme Court has not agreed to review the case.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
Their petition is pending and was distributed for a Supreme Court conference; that does not mean the Court agreed to hear the case.
Federal law requires a surviving spouse’s pension to be equal in value to a single-life pension; the dispute concerns what that requires of the assumptions used to calculate the benefit.
Question presented
Whether the reference to actuarially equivalent benefits in 29 U.S.C. 1055(d) places a substantive constraint on the reasonableness of the actuarial assumptions used to determine that benefit, even though Section 1055(d) does not use the word “reasonable” or mention actuarial assumptions?
What happens next
The Court’s next step is to decide whether to hear the petition. It was distributed for a Nov. 6, 2026, conference, but that does not mean the Court agreed to hear it or guarantee a decision date.
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
New document added
Show 7 moreShow fewer
Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type
Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type
Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type
Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type
Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type
Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type
Brief added: Petition
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.