Skip to main content

Workers' comp for federal inspectors

Goodley v. Supreme Rice

Updated Nov 11, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Dismissed

Petition denied.

What it’s about
Rachel E. Goodley’s filing asks whether a federal inspector’s rice inspections and certifications count as part of Supreme Rice’s business, making the inspector an employee of the mill for Louisiana workers’ compensation purposes (a “statutory employee”).
Who it affects
The denial gave Goodley and Supreme Rice no Supreme Court answer on whether the inspections were part of the mill’s business or whether Louisiana could treat the federal inspector as its employee.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Rachel E. Goodley, Petitioner v. Supreme Rice, L.L.C., et al.
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

It also asks whether Louisiana can apply that rule to a federal inspector doing official regulatory work.

Goodley’s petition described federal rice inspections as impartial, official government services.

Question presented

1. Is the inspection and certification of rice by a federal grain inspector part of the principal trade and business of a rice mill for purposes of determining whether said federal grain inspector is a statutory employee of the rice mill under the “two-contract” theory of the Louisiana Workers’ Compensation Act when the purpose of the Federal Grain Inspection Service is to provide impartial and official Government inspection services? 2. Whether a State may apply its workers’ compensation statutory-employer doctrine to treat a federal employee performing official regulatory duties as the statutory employee of the regulated private entity.

Documents

1

Docket activity

7
  • New analysis added

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 11, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Nov 11, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

Show 2 more
  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jun 30, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 11, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis