Skip to main content

Religious accommodations at work

Detwiler v. Mid-Columbia Medical Center

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
Sherry Detwiler asks the Supreme Court to review the Ninth Circuit’s decision throwing out her claim that Mid-Columbia Medical Center did not accommodate her religious objection at work.
What's at stake
The Ninth Circuit's decision to throw out Detwiler's claim remains in place while the Supreme Court decides whether to hear her case.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

She argues science does not cancel out her reliance on prayer and Scripture; the Court distributed her petition for a conference, but that is not a decision to hear it.

Detwiler's petition asks whether a court may throw out a claim that an employer failed to make room for a worker's religious belief before evidence is heard when the worker also gives nonreligious reasons.

Question presented

At the pleading stage, is the minority view espoused by the Ninth and Third Circuits, dismissing religious accommodation claims which contain overlapping spiritual and secular rationales, consistent with: A. The statutory text of Title VII; B. Title VII and Free Exercise precedents; and C. This Court’s application of the pleading requirements of FRCP 12(b)(6)?

What happens next

The next step is for the Court to decide whether to hear the petition. The conference distribution does not guarantee a decision on Dec. 4, 2026.

Documents

1

Docket activity

12
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type

    Nov 4, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

Show 7 more
  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Nov 2, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 16, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 16, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 16, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • New document added

    Sep 4, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 3, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Brief added: Petition

    Aug 13, 2026 · Court records

More questions

1
What does Detwiler say about her religious reasons?
She argues that scientific understanding does not cancel out her reliance on prayer and Scripture.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis