Repeat challenges by prisoners
Michael Shane Ragland v. United States
In brief
- Where it stands
- Petition Pending
Awaiting an order on the petition
- What it’s about
- Michael Shane Ragland filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to decide whether a district court may consider a federal prisoner’s entire second or later challenge to a conviction, or only the claim an appeals court approved.
- What's at stake
- The unresolved question is how much of a federal prisoner's later challenge a district court may consider.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
His filing describes a split: the Eleventh and Fifth Circuits limit review to the approved claim, while five other circuits allow review of the full application.
Ragland's petition says the Eleventh and Fifth Circuits limit review to an approved claim, while five other circuits allow review of the full application.
Question presented
Whether a district court’s jurisdiction over a second or successive habeas application by a federal prisoner is limited to the specific “claim” certified by the court of appeals, as the Eleventh and Fifth Circuits hold, or whether it embraces the entire “application,” as the statute’s text provides and as five circuits—the First, Second, Fourth, Seventh, and Ninth—hold.
What happens next
The Court must decide whether to hear the case. No oral argument or decision date is scheduled.
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
New document added
Show 5 moreShow fewer
Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type
Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type
New document added
Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type
Brief added: Petition
More questions
- What must a federal prisoner show to get permission for a second challenge?
- The prisoner must ask the appeals court for permission and make a preliminary showing of newly discovered evidence or a new constitutional rule that applies to older cases.
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.