Skip to main content

State receivers in bankruptcy

Protopapas v. Whittaker Clark & Daniels

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
Peter Protopapas, a state-appointed receiver, objected to a bankruptcy court ruling and asks the Supreme Court to agree to hear the case, wipe out the Third Circuit’s decision (vacate it), and send the case back for another look (remand it) in light of T.M.
What's at stake
Protopapas’s request to wipe out the Third Circuit’s decision and return the case for another look remains unresolved.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

The dispute follows Protopapas’s objection to a bankruptcy court ruling and a decision by the Third Circuit.

Question presented

Whether the Court should grant, vacate, and remand for reconsideration in light of T.M?

What happens next

The Court must decide whether to hear the case. No oral argument or decision date is set.

Documents

1

Docket activity

7
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 4, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

Show 2 more
  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Aug 25, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jul 24, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis