Skip to main content

Unanimous military jury verdicts

Jonatan O. RosarioMartinez v. United States

Updated Nov 11, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Dismissed

Petition denied.

What it’s about
Four service members—Jonatan O. RosarioMartinez, Leo J.
Who it affects
The four service members received no Supreme Court ruling on whether their court-martial convictions could rest on nonunanimous votes.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Jonatan O. RosarioMartinez, Petitioner v. United States
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

Navarro Aguirre, Jesus Martinez, and Alexander L. Driskill—challenge their military-court convictions, asking whether the Fifth Amendment allows a panel of non-judge members to convict without unanimous agreement.

The four service members' cases arose from court-martial convictions, and their petition questioned whether a panel of nonjudges could convict without all members agreeing.

Question presented

Does the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause permit conviction in a court-martial by the non-unanimous vote of a panel of lay members?

Documents

1

Docket activity

7
  • New analysis added

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 11, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Nov 11, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

Show 2 more
  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jul 24, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 11, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis