Skip to main content

No. 24-624October Term 2025Decided Jan 14, 2026

Docket 24-624October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

William Trevor Case, Petitioner v. Montana

Police can enter a home without a warrant to give emergency aid when the legal standard the Court described is met.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jan 14, 2026
Case Accepted
Arguments HeardOct 15, 2025
Decision ReleasedJan 14, 2026
What it's about

The Court unanimously affirmed the Montana Supreme Court's decision in a 9-0 ruling authored by Justice Kagan. The case addressed state court jurisdiction and procedure.

Question presented

May law enforcement enter a home without a search warrant based on less than probable cause that an emergency is occurring?

Case path

Supreme Court of Montana / Decision released Jan 14, 2026

Area

Constitutional Law

Briefing

What it's about

The Supreme Court unanimously sided with Montana and left in place the state court's decision. The case asked when police may enter a home without a warrant to give emergency aid.

Vote

The Court affirmed in a 9-0 decision authored by Justice Kagan.

Police may enter when they have an "objectively reasonable basis for believing" that someone inside needs emergency aid.

— Justice Justice Kagan(majority)

Impact

The decision affects police officers, people in their homes, and trial judges reviewing emergency entries. For example, officers responding to signs of a medical crisis may enter if they reasonably believe someone inside needs help.

What's next

Lower courts and police agencies will apply the Supreme Court's rule to future emergency-entry cases. Departments may update training, and judges will use this decision when deciding whether evidence from those entries can be used.

What was the main fight in William Trevor Case v. Montana?

The case asked whether police may enter a home without a warrant on less than probable cause when they believe an emergency is happening. The Supreme Court ruled for Montana.

Who is most affected by this ruling in real life?

Police officers, homeowners, and people needing urgent help are directly affected. The decision also guides judges deciding whether an emergency entry was lawful.

What happens next after the Supreme Court's decision in this case?

Montana's result stands, and lower courts must follow the Supreme Court's rule. Police agencies may revise training and policies for emergency home entries.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

Police can enter a home without a warrant to give emergency aid when the legal standard the Court described is met.

Result
Affirmed

Impact

This affects people in medical or mental health emergencies, and the officers responding to them. Police may enter a home without a warrant when they reasonably believe someone faces serious harm. For example, officers could enter after a suicide report, silence inside, and signs like a holster. Next, courts will judge these entries by an objectively reasonable basis, not probable cause (criminal-evidence standard). This may shape future disputes over emergency aid, especially during

Not official Court text.