Skip to main content

No. 24-171October Term 2025Decided Mar 25, 2026Updated Sep 1, 2026

Docket 24-171October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment

Cox Communications, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sony Music Entertainment, et al.

The Court has issued its decision, but the available information does not identify who won or what rule the Court adopted.

Case status

Decided 9-0 · March 25, 2026 · Opinion by Justice Thomas

Read the opinion (PDF)
Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Mar 25, 2026
Case AcceptedJun 30, 2025
Arguments HeardDec 1, 2025
Decision ReleasedMar 25, 2026
What it's about

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled for Cox Communications, holding that an internet provider is not contributorily liable for users’ copyright infringement merely because it knew some subscribers were infringing and continued to provide service. The Court held that liability requires intent to promote infringement, shown by inducing it or providing a service tailored to infringement; Cox did neither, so the Fourth Circuit’s judgment was reversed and the case remanded.

Question presented

Can an internet service provider be held liable, and found to have acted willfully, for copyright infringement just because it knew users were infringing and did not terminate their access?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit / Decision released Mar 25, 2026

Area

Copyright Law

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Court has issued its decision, but the available information does not identify who won or what rule the Court adopted.

Result
Reversed

Impact

Internet subscribers and providers are affected. A provider is not contributorily liable (legally responsible for someone else’s infringement) for continuing service after piracy reports. For example, Cox can keep serving a subscriber flagged for downloading songs without that alone creating liability. The ruling reverses and remands the Fourth Circuit decision. Providers can still face liability if they affirmatively induce infringement or offer services tailored to infringement.

Not official Court text.

Briefing

What it's about

The case asks whether an internet provider can be liable for users' copyright infringement because it knew about infringement and did not cut off their internet access. The Court released a decision on March 25, 2026, but the available record does not state the result or reasoning.

Vote

Justice Thomas wrote the 9–0 opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Jackson, Alito, Kagan, Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch; Justice Sotomayor concurred.

Impact

The case could affect internet providers, music companies, and subscribers accused of sharing copyrighted works. For example, it could shape when a provider must respond to infringement notices about a customer's account.

What's next

Lower courts and affected parties will review the Court's opinion and apply its rule in future copyright cases. Cox, music companies, and other internet providers may assess whether their policies need changes.

What did the Supreme Court rule in Cox Communications v. Sony Music?

The Court released a decision on March 25, 2026. The available record does not provide the outcome or the Court's reasoning.

Who is affected by Cox Communications v. Sony Music?

Internet providers, copyright owners, and subscribers may be affected. The case concerns provider responsibility for users' alleged copyright infringement.

What happens next after Cox Communications v. Sony Music?

Lower courts and parties will study the opinion and apply its rule. Internet providers and copyright owners may review their enforcement practices.

Timing

Decided March 25, 2026

The Court released its decision 114 days after oral argument on December 1, 2025. The median for cases argued in December is 148 days.

Based on 23 merits cases argued in December since 1995.Argument and decision days

Activity

Docket activity10
  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 1, 2026 | Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Sep 1, 2026 | Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Sep 1, 2026 | Generated

  • Opinion added: Opinion of the Court - T

    Mar 25, 2026 | Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Mar 25, 2026 | Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Mar 8, 2026 | Court records

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Cox Communications, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sony Music Entertainment, et al.

    Dec 1, 2025 | Court records

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment

    Dec 1, 2025 | Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Aug 15, 2024 | Court records

  • Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions

    May 28, 2024 | Court records