No. 24-171October Term 2025Decided Mar 25, 2026Updated Sep 1, 2026
Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment
Cox Communications, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sony Music Entertainment, et al.
The Court has issued its decision, but the available information does not identify who won or what rule the Court adopted.
Case status
Decided 9-0 · March 25, 2026 · Opinion by Justice Thomas
Read the opinion (PDF)- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Mar 25, 2026
- Argued alongside
- What it's about
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled for Cox Communications, holding that an internet provider is not contributorily liable for users’ copyright infringement merely because it knew some subscribers were infringing and continued to provide service. The Court held that liability requires intent to promote infringement, shown by inducing it or providing a service tailored to infringement; Cox did neither, so the Fourth Circuit’s judgment was reversed and the case remanded.
Question presented
Can an internet service provider be held liable, and found to have acted willfully, for copyright infringement just because it knew users were infringing and did not terminate their access?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit / Decision released Mar 25, 2026
- Area
Copyright Law
Decision
What the Court decided
The Court has issued its decision, but the available information does not identify who won or what rule the Court adopted.
- Result
- Reversed
Impact
Internet subscribers and providers are affected. A provider is not contributorily liable (legally responsible for someone else’s infringement) for continuing service after piracy reports. For example, Cox can keep serving a subscriber flagged for downloading songs without that alone creating liability. The ruling reverses and remands the Fourth Circuit decision. Providers can still face liability if they affirmatively induce infringement or offer services tailored to infringement.
Not official Court text.
Vote
- Vote split
- 9-0
- Majority author
- Clarence Thomas
Opinion documents
Briefing
What it's about
The case asks whether an internet provider can be liable for users' copyright infringement because it knew about infringement and did not cut off their internet access. The Court released a decision on March 25, 2026, but the available record does not state the result or reasoning.
Vote
Impact
The case could affect internet providers, music companies, and subscribers accused of sharing copyrighted works. For example, it could shape when a provider must respond to infringement notices about a customer's account.
What's next
Lower courts and affected parties will review the Court's opinion and apply its rule in future copyright cases. Cox, music companies, and other internet providers may assess whether their policies need changes.
What did the Supreme Court rule in Cox Communications v. Sony Music?
The Court released a decision on March 25, 2026. The available record does not provide the outcome or the Court's reasoning.
Who is affected by Cox Communications v. Sony Music?
Internet providers, copyright owners, and subscribers may be affected. The case concerns provider responsibility for users' alleged copyright infringement.
What happens next after Cox Communications v. Sony Music?
Lower courts and parties will study the opinion and apply its rule. Internet providers and copyright owners may review their enforcement practices.
Timing
Decided March 25, 2026
The Court released its decision 114 days after oral argument on December 1, 2025. The median for cases argued in December is 148 days.
Documents
Opinions
Clarence Thomas
Orders
Audio
Key filings
Briefs on file: 48View on supremecourt.gov
Activity
Docket activity10
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
Sep 1, 2026 | Generated
AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis
Sep 1, 2026 | Generated
AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary
Sep 1, 2026 | Generated
Opinion added: Opinion of the Court - T
Mar 25, 2026 | Court records
Opinion added: opinion
Mar 25, 2026 | Court records
Brief added: Questions Presented
Mar 8, 2026 | Court records
Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Cox Communications, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sony Music Entertainment, et al.
Dec 1, 2025 | Court records
Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment
Dec 1, 2025 | Court records
Brief added: Petition
Aug 15, 2024 | Court records
Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions
May 28, 2024 | Court records
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Sep 1, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials13
Supreme Court docket 24-171
docket | Sep 3, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Sep 3, 2026
Opinion of the Court (Clarence Thomas)
opinion | Mar 25, 2026
Opinion
opinion | Mar 25, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | Mar 8, 2026
Oral argument
audio | Dec 1, 2025
Oral argument
audio | Dec 1, 2025
Petition
brief | Aug 15, 2024
Lower Court Orders/Opinions
order | May 28, 2024
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 1, 2026