Skip to main content
Docket 24-171October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Cox Communications, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sony Music Entertainment, et al.

The Court has decided the case, but the supplied record does not say exactly who won or how broadly the Court answered the liability question.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Mar 25, 2026
Case AcceptedJun 30, 2025
Arguments HeardDec 1, 2025
Decision ReleasedMar 25, 2026
What it's about

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Question presented

Can an internet service provider be held liable, and found to have acted willfully, for copyright infringement just because it knew users were infringing and did not terminate their access?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit / Decision released Mar 25, 2026

Area

Copyright Law

Briefing

What it's about

The Supreme Court released a decision in a fight over whether an internet service provider can be liable for users' copyright infringement and treated as acting willfully when it knew about infringement and did not cut off access. The prompt does not provide the outcome details, vote, or full reasoning.

Vote

The Court issued its decision on March 25, 2026, but the prompt does not provide the vote or opinion lineup.

Impact

This case matters to internet providers, music and movie companies, and subscribers accused of piracy. For example, it could affect how aggressively an ISP responds to repeat infringement notices and whether companies seek bigger damages.

What's next

Lower courts and the parties will now apply the Supreme Court's decision using the full opinion. Internet providers, copyright owners, and lawyers will review the opinion to adjust enforcement practices, damages arguments, and compliance policies.

What was the core dispute in Cox v. Sony Music?

The case asked whether an internet provider can be liable for copyright infringement based on knowing users were infringing and not terminating service. It also asked whether that conduct can count as willful.

What real-world consequences could this case have?

It could change how internet providers handle repeat infringement notices and customer terminations. Copyright owners may also change how they pursue lawsuits and damages.

What happens next procedurally after the Supreme Court's decision?

The parties and lower courts must now follow the Supreme Court's opinion in any further proceedings. Affected businesses will study the opinion and update their policies and litigation strategies.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Court has decided the case, but the supplied record does not say exactly who won or how broadly the Court answered the liability question.

Result
Reversed

Impact

This affects internet providers, subscribers, and copyright owners. The Court said an ISP is not liable just for continuing service. For example, Cox was not automatically responsible because flagged users kept internet access. Next cases may focus on whether a provider intended infringement (meant its service to be used for piracy). The ruling also suggests knowledge alone may not be enough to prove willful conduct.

Not official Court text.