Skip to main content

King v. Brownback

Updated Sep 19, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court denied review (refused to hear the case), so neither legal question was decided here.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · October 30, 2023 · Opinion by Justice Sotomayor

What it’s about
This case considers whether an order resolving a Federal Tort Claims Act claim blocks other claims arising from the same incident in the same lawsuit, and whether officers in joint state-federal task forces act under state law.
Who it affects
The Court did not decide whether the Federal Tort Claims Act's judgment bar (a rule that can block related claims) applies to claims from the same incident in one lawsuit.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for King v. Brownback
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The dispute involved limits on federal tort claims and lawsuits involving officers from joint state-federal task forces.

Question presented

1. Whether an order resolving a Federal Tort Claims Act claim blocks other claims arising from the same incident in the same lawsuit? 2. Whether officers in joint state-federal task forces act under state law?

What the Court decided

Holding

Petition DENIED. Statement of Justice Sotomayor respecting the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion )

The vote

Majority author
Sonia Sotomayor

What's next

The Supreme Court's action is complete. No further Supreme Court step resolving these questions is shown in this case.

Why it matters

It also did not decide whether task-force officers act under state law or endorse either side's position.

Documents

3

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 19, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Sep 19, 2026 · Generated

  • Opinion added: King

    Oct 30, 2023 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Opinion

    Oct 30, 2023 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Brief added: Petition

    Mar 17, 2023 · Court records

More questions

4
What did the Supreme Court do in King v. Brownback?
The Court refused to hear the case and denied review. It did not decide the two legal questions.
What legal questions did King v. Brownback raise?
It asked whether resolving a Federal Tort Claims Act claim blocks other claims from the same incident in the same lawsuit. It also asked whether officers in joint state-federal task forces act under state law.
Did the Supreme Court decide who won in King v. Brownback?
No. The Court's refusal to hear the case did not decide the legal questions or endorse either side.
What happens next after the Court denied review in King v. Brownback?
The Supreme Court's action is complete. No further Supreme Court step resolving these questions is shown.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 19, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis