Skip to main content

No. 20-927October Term 2020Decided Jan 15, 2021

Docket 20-927October Term 2020 (2020–2021)

United States v. Higgs

This is a dispute over where a federal execution could take place after the original state no longer permitted executions.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jan 15, 2021
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedJan 15, 2021
What it's about

This case concerned federal death-row inmate Dustin Higgs, who was sentenced to death in Maryland for the kidnapping and murders of three women on federal land. The dispute was whether, after Maryland abolished the death penalty, federal law allowed the court to designate another state, Indiana, to carry out his execution.

Question presented

Whether, after Maryland abolished the death penalty, federal law allowed the court to designate another state, Indiana, to carry out his execution?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit / Decision released Jan 15, 2021

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

The case asks whether federal law let a court choose Indiana as the place for Dustin Higgs's execution after Maryland abolished the death penalty. Higgs was sentenced to death in Maryland for the kidnapping and murders of three women on federal land.

Vote

The Court has not scheduled oral argument yet. The key question is whether federal law allowed a court to designate Indiana after Maryland ended the death penalty.

Impact

The dispute affects how the federal government can carry out a death sentence when the original state no longer allows executions. That matters for federal death-row inmates whose crimes were tied to states that later changed their laws.

What's next

The next milestone is a scheduling move from the Supreme Court, such as setting oral argument or taking another action on the case. No decision window is available yet.

What is the main fight in United States v. Higgs?

The fight is over whether federal law allowed Indiana to be chosen for the execution after Maryland abolished the death penalty.

Why could this case matter beyond Dustin Higgs?

It could shape what happens to other federal death-row inmates when the state tied to their sentence no longer carries out executions.

What should readers watch for next in United States v. Higgs?

Watch for oral argument to be scheduled or for another Supreme Court scheduling step. No argument date or decision window is available yet.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

This is a dispute over where a federal execution could take place after the original state no longer permitted executions.

Impact

The dispute affects how the federal government can carry out a death sentence when the original state no longer allows executions. That matters for federal death-row inmates whose crimes were tied to states that later changed their laws.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents

Timing

Decided January 15, 2021

The Court released its decision on January 15, 2021 without hearing oral argument.