Lewis v. United States
In brief
The Supreme Court turned down Lewis's request to hear the case, so it did not rule on the First Step Act, the Armed Career Criminal Act, or Lewis's claim that the law is too unclear.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · June 1, 2020
- What it’s about
- This case asks whether the First Step Act's definition of a felony drug offense changes how sentence enhancements are applied under the Armed Career Criminal Act.
- Who it affects
- Only Lewis's request for Supreme Court review was resolved; the order did not decide the legal questions raised in his petition.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about
It also questions whether the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague due to unclear definitions.
The lower-court case came from the Fourth Circuit and involved federal sentence increases, the First Step Act's drug-offense definition, and the clarity of the Armed Career Criminal Act.
Question presented
1. Whether the First Step Act's definition of a felony drug offense changes how sentence enhancements are applied under the Armed Career Criminal Act. 2. Whether the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague due to unclear definitions.
What the Court decided
Holding
Petition DENIED.
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. No merits ruling or further Supreme Court step is shown for these questions.
Documents
Opinions
Key filings
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Show 7 moreShow fewer
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
More questions
- Did the denial endorse Lewis or the United States?
- No. The order was only a refusal to review the case, not a decision for either side on the legal questions.
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.