O'Donnell v. United States
In brief
The Supreme Court refused to hear O'Donnell's case, leaving the Fourth Circuit's ruling in place without deciding whether SORNA's delegation was constitutional.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · June 1, 2020
- What it’s about
- This case involves a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Fourth Circuit, likely raising issues related to the nondelegation doctrine following the Supreme Court's decision in Gundy v. United States.
- Who it affects
- The Fourth Circuit's ruling remained in place in O'Donnell's case, but the Supreme Court did not rule on whether SORNA's delegation violates the Constitution.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
The case came from the Fourth Circuit after Gundy v. United States and involved a related question about how much authority SORNA gives the Attorney General.
Question presented
Whether the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act’s delegation of authority to the Attorney General to determine the Act’s retroactive reach violates the nondelegation doctrine.
What the Court decided
Holding
Petition DENIED.
What's next
The Supreme Court's docket action is complete. The Fourth Circuit's ruling remains the operative decision in O'Donnell's case; this order did not resolve the legal question.
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Show 7 moreShow fewer
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
More questions
- What did the Fourth Circuit decide about SORNA's delegation?
- The Fourth Circuit concluded that the delegation did not violate the nondelegation doctrine.
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.