Skip to main content

No. 19-8269October Term 2019Decided May 18, 2020

Docket 19-8269October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

James v. United States

This case asks whether forensic pathology reports are considered testimonial evidence under the Confrontation Clause of the Constitution.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released May 18, 2020
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedMay 18, 2020
What it's about

This case asks whether forensic pathology reports are considered testimonial evidence under the Confrontation Clause of the Constitution. This determination affects whether the authors of such reports must be available for cross-examination in court.

Question presented

Whether forensic pathology reports are considered testimonial evidence under the Confrontation Clause of the Constitution.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit / Decision released May 18, 2020

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Grounding

Grounding
Primary-source trail available.
Note
Plain-English explainer. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Mar 31, 2026
Primary materials5