Mendel v. Uber Techs.
In brief
The Supreme Court refused to hear the case, leaving the Ninth Circuit's ruling in place; it did not decide whether Uber drivers fall within the exemption.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · May 26, 2020
- What it’s about
- The Court denied review of a Ninth Circuit case involving whether Uber drivers fall within the Federal Arbitration Act’s exemption for transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce. The Ninth Circuit’s ruling therefore remained in effect.
- Who it affects
- The order left the Ninth Circuit's ruling in place for the parties in this case, without a Supreme Court decision on whether the exemption covers Uber drivers.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about
The dispute arose over whether drivers who use Uber's app to provide transportation services fit the Federal Arbitration Act's exemption for workers engaged in interstate commerce.
Question presented
Whether the Federal Arbitration Act’s exemption for “contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce,” 9 U.S.C. § 1, applies to drivers who use the Uber app to provide transportation services?
What the Court decided
Holding
Petition DENIED.
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. The Ninth Circuit's ruling remains the ruling in this case, with no Supreme Court decision on the main legal question.
Documents
Opinions
Key filings
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Show 7 moreShow fewer
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.