Skip to main content

Mendel v. Uber Techs.

Updated Sep 20, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court refused to hear the case, leaving the Ninth Circuit's ruling in place; it did not decide whether Uber drivers fall within the exemption.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · May 26, 2020

What it’s about
The Court denied review of a Ninth Circuit case involving whether Uber drivers fall within the Federal Arbitration Act’s exemption for transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce. The Ninth Circuit’s ruling therefore remained in effect.
Who it affects
The order left the Ninth Circuit's ruling in place for the parties in this case, without a Supreme Court decision on whether the exemption covers Uber drivers.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Mendel v. Uber Techs., Inc.
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The dispute arose over whether drivers who use Uber's app to provide transportation services fit the Federal Arbitration Act's exemption for workers engaged in interstate commerce.

Question presented

Whether the Federal Arbitration Act’s exemption for “contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce,” 9 U.S.C. § 1, applies to drivers who use the Uber app to provide transportation services?

What the Court decided

Holding

Petition DENIED.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. The Ninth Circuit's ruling remains the ruling in this case, with no Supreme Court decision on the main legal question.

Documents

2

Docket activity

24
  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 20, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Show 7 more
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Older entries are on the full docket.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 20, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis