Gunter v. Pulsipher
In brief
The Supreme Court refused to hear Gunter's request for review, leaving the lower-court decisions in place without deciding the three questions he raised.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · May 26, 2020
- What it’s about
- The Court denied Gunter’s petition for review, leaving in place the lower courts’ dismissal of his complaint and their denials of his requests to amend the complaint and for appointed counsel. The denial did not decide the merits of those claims.
- Who it affects
- The lower-court decisions remain in place for Gunter; the Supreme Court did not decide whether his lawsuit stated a valid claim, whether he could change it, or whether he should receive a court-appointed lawyer.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about
The dispute reached the Supreme Court from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Question presented
1. Whether the district court erred in dismissing Petitioner’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted? 2. Whether the district court erred in denying Petitioner’s motion for leave to amend his complaint? 3. Whether the district court erred in denying Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel?
What the Court decided
Holding
Petition DENIED.
What's next
The Court has finished this docket action. The lower-court rulings remain in effect; the Supreme Court did not resolve Gunter's three questions.
Documents
Opinions
Key filings
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Show 7 moreShow fewer
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
More questions
- What did the lower courts decide?
- They threw out Gunter's lawsuit and denied his requests to change it and for a court-appointed lawyer.
- What remains unresolved in Gunter v. Pulsipher?
- The Supreme Court did not decide whether Gunter stated a valid claim, could change his lawsuit, or should receive a court-appointed lawyer.
- Did the Supreme Court announce a substantive rule?
- No. It declined to hear the petition and did not decide the main legal questions.
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.