No. 19-8020October Term 2019Decided April 20, 2020Updated Sep 3, 2026
Jordan v. United States
The Court declined review, leaving the Fifth Circuit's result in place without deciding Jordan's legal arguments.
Case status
Where it stands
Decided · April 20, 2020
Question presented
Whether the trial court's order granting a request by the accused's codefendant to prohibit the accused from testifying about details that were exculpatory to the accused but prejudicial to his codefendant constituted an impermissible limitation on the accused's right to testify in his own behalf as set forth in Rock v?
Timeline
Decision
What the Court decided
The Court declined review, leaving the Fifth Circuit's result in place without deciding Jordan's legal arguments.
Impact
The Fifth Circuit's result remained in place for Jordan. The dispute matters to criminal defendants whose defense testimony could help them but harm a codefendant.
Briefing
What it's about
The Supreme Court declined to review Walter Jordan's case on April 20, 2020. It did not decide the merits of his claim that limits on testimony violated his right to testify in his own defense.
Impact
The Fifth Circuit's result remained in place for Jordan. The dispute matters to criminal defendants whose defense testimony could help them but harm a codefendant.
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished its action on this docket. Jordan's case remains governed by the Fifth Circuit's result.
What did the Supreme Court rule in Jordan v. United States?
The Court declined review of Jordan's case. It did not decide the merits of his arguments.
Who was affected by the Court's action in Jordan's case?
Jordan remained subject to the Fifth Circuit's result. The action also left unresolved the broader dispute over limits on a defendant's testimony.
What happens next in Jordan v. United States?
The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. The Fifth Circuit's result remains in place.
Timing
Decided April 20, 2020
The Court released its decision on April 20, 2020 without hearing oral argument.
Documents
Activity
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
Brief added: Petition
Related cases
Mujera Benjamin Lung'aho v. United StatesDecided25-6124Decided
IEEPA tariffsLearning Resources, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.Decided24-1287Decided
Geofence warrantsOkello T. Chatrie, Petitioner v. United StatesDecided25-112Decided
Federal Reserve removal powerDonald J. Trump, President of the United States, Applicant v. Lisa D. Cook, Member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemDecided25A312Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.