Skip to main content

No. 19-8015October Term 2019Decided Apr 20, 2020Updated Sep 3, 2026

Docket 19-8015October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

Cruz v. United States

The Court declined review, leaving the Eleventh Circuit's result in place without deciding the merits.

Case status

Decided · April 20, 2020

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Apr 20, 2020
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedApr 20, 2020
What it's about

The Court held that a district court’s failure to advise a defendant that the government must prove the defendant knew of his prohibited status under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) is not a structural error requiring automatic reversal. A defendant who did not preserve the error must show a reasonable probability that it affected the outcome, so the United States prevailed.

Question presented

Whether the district court’s failure to advise a defendant of the “knowledge-of-status” element of a 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) offense, as required by Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), is a structural error that requires automatic reversal?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit / Decision released Apr 20, 2020

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Court declined review, leaving the Eleventh Circuit's result in place without deciding the merits.

Impact

The lower-court result remains in place for Cruz. The case concerned defendants charged under the federal gun-possession law who were not advised that the government must prove they knew their prohibited status.

Not official Court text.

Briefing

What it's about

The Supreme Court declined to review Cruz's case on April 20, 2020. It did not decide whether failing to tell a defendant about the knowledge-of-status requirement in a federal gun-possession case requires automatic reversal.

Impact

The lower-court result remains in place for Cruz. The case concerned defendants charged under the federal gun-possession law who were not advised that the government must prove they knew their prohibited status.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished its action in this case. The lower-court judgment remains in effect.

What did the Supreme Court do in Cruz v. United States?

The Court declined to review the case. It did not decide the legal question raised by Cruz.

Who is affected by the issue in Cruz's case?

People charged under the federal gun-possession law may raise similar arguments when they were not advised of the knowledge-of-status requirement.

What happens next after Cruz v. United States?

The Supreme Court's action is complete. The Eleventh Circuit's result remains in place for Cruz.

Timing

Decided April 20, 2020

The Court released its decision on April 20, 2020 without hearing oral argument.

Activity

Docket activity2
  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 3, 2026 | Generated

  • Brief added: Petition

    Mar 13, 2020 | Court records