Yaney v. Mason

1. Did the California Supreme Court have a duty to protect petitioners’ individual constitutional rights for a claim of discrimination on how the association, by definition, affected the actions of others given that the court knew the association affected petitioners as individuals differently by definition? 2. Petitioners, both of whom are insular and discrete minorities, ask under this court’s proclaimed duty to oversee its lower courts under uniformity, did the California Supreme Court violate petitioners’ Fourteenth Amendment Right of Equal Protection and Due Process when they summarily denied and rejected review of the dismissal of petitioners’ appeal and discoveries that they had rejected petitioners’ association while knowing their claim of discrimination had merit and had been denied filing and adjudication in the trial court?