Nigl v. Litscher

1. Whether the "neutrality" of a prison regulation under Thornburgh v. Abbott, 490 U.S. 401 (1989), depends on the regulation's facial content-neutrality or the government's motive for adopting it. 2. Whether, under Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987), a prison regulation that infringes on First Amendment rights can be upheld as "rationally related" to a legitimate penological interest in the absence of any evidence that the restricted speech actually causes the harms the regulation is intended to prevent.